Skip to main content

Anger & Bitterness: The NBA Draft Lottery

If you tried to measure the just how bad the draft lottery went for both the Celtics as well as the NBA in general it would register the lowest amount on every scale imaginable. Let's Count the Ways that last night sucked:

Celtic Woahs

1) The Celtics Managed to yet again avoid garnering a franchise Center.
2) Doc Rivers was given a contract extension, and will remain the coach.
3) Ditto on Danny Ainge. And both are horrendous.
4) The chances of the Celtics getting the fifth pick would be slightly under 17% if they did not take the ping pongs balls out after each lottery selection.
5) The Celtics had 19.9% chance to get pick #1. After the Blazers landed #1 pick the Cs had a 21% Chance of getting the #2 pick. After the Sonics landed that they had a 23.1% chance of landing pick 3.
6) When you take into account the lottery balls being pulled out the Celtics had a 44.9% chance to move up a pick on the first selection, a 47.3% chance to move up on the second selection, and a 52.1% chance to move up on the 3rd selection. Or overall under a 14% chance at staying at the 5 hole. Thus that was the least likely spot of any 1-5 that they could land in.
6) Now the Celtics sit at pick 5 where Conley should already be gone, and they will either draft the Chinese guy or attempt to make one of Danny's patented horrible trades.
7) How pissed did Tommy Look? And where was the spirit of Red. Boo.

Other Team Pains

1) The Grizzlies would have been good if they landed a top 2 pick, now not so much. They had a 25% chance at 1, 26.3% at 2, and a 29% chance of pick 3. Or just under a 40% chance of not moving up into the lottery. Ouch.
2) The Suns missed out on garnering a top 5 pick because the Hawks landed in the lottery. That sucks for them. And with the Hawks having the 3rd and 11th pick, they should be able to improve the team enough to ensure that the 2008 pick they give the Suns isn't that high a pick.

League Wide Woahs

1) This furthers the west coast dominance, as both the Blazers and the Sonics will be marketedly better next year. The East coast is already so far behind the West Coast at the top, this just furthers the western conferences depth in the conference over the East.
2) Does this create a legit Blazer vs. Sonics rivalry? Would that not be the lamest rivalry in the history of Pro Sports?
3) The Sonics were just about ready to bail town, will they string along for a little while now?
4) Both players are headed to some of the smallest markets in the NBA.
5) Because they are west coast teams, they will play most of their games after 10, meaning East Coast fans won't see much of them.

So basically this spring has been just about as bad as the NBA could possibly be for me. I have almost completely non interested in the NBA playoffs, partially because of the poor matchups and partially because of Stern blowing up the best series, and now the Celtics got completely boned in the lottery, and the NBA is ensuring that the Eastern Conference will remain irrelevent for the foreseeable future. So who's ready to watch more baseball?

Comments

Anonymous said…
From the perspective of those of us in the wild west, land of rugged individuality, it was so sweet to see the east get their chops busted again, crying like little girls. We're dancing in the streets out here in the land of champions. Eat your hearts out!
Shaft said…
Having a No. 2 pick might just save one franchise from packing up shop and leaving town. Celtics are staying regardless. You pose some great questions though.

http://royalbroughamway.com
Anonymous said…
It's good that the Sonics and Blazers get the top two picks because they have great fans and they're both great bball cities.
Atlanta's a joke, the Grizz/Bucks fans don't care. Celtics... Tough break. Maybe that's karma. Or Red Auerbach still being pissed about the Celtic dancers.
Anonymous said…
I can't believe the whining coming from the East --- give us the draft because we feel sorry for ourselves etc etc
Anonymous said…
I can't believe people still watch basketball.
Anonymous said…
What do soccer, hockey, and basketball have in common? Nobody watches them. Its tough to watch sports where people get knocked down and cry to try and get a foul call. "We're dancing in the streets out here in the land of champions..." You sound like a sissy girl. Chalk these sports up with boxing because they're on their way out.
Anonymous said…
There IS a rivalry between Seattle and Portland already, you idiot, for decades. Just because you've never heard of it (because ESPN decides not to talk about either team until the last ten minutes of Sportscenter) doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Take your blinders off, you Boston-is-the-center-of-the-universe faggot. Unbelievable.

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Bret Boone

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. Mr. Boone was once the best power hitting second baseman in the league. How questionable was his success? Averages Say: Why the extra plateu in his mid 30s? At Bats Per Home Run Says: Lowest at Bats Per Home Runs at 37? Hmm.... Explaining It Away Yeak, this one is tough. Umm, late bloomer? He showed potential power early in his career and he just liked playing in Seattle a lot more than everywhere else? And umm, his career was kind of like a running backs in that it just all of a sudden fell off the map? Any of these convincing you? The Verdict Guy never hits more than 24 home runs in a season and then in his age 32 season he hits 37? And in SafeCo a pitchers park to boot? And he follows that up with 24, 35, 24 homer years still at SafeCo? And then he completely falls off the map in 2005 never to be heard from again? We've got a Screamer... Man Get Big Muscles In 30s. Hm...

Numbers On Steroids: Mickey Mantle

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. This week it's throwing a curve ball and looking at All Time Great Yankees. Players that we know did not take steroids to see if this gives a defense to any of the players 'convicted' by Numbers on Steroids. Time to look at my dad's favorite athlete of all time, Mickey Mantle. Averages Say: What's with the mysterious dip at 27 and then the uptick? At Bats Per Home Run Says: That's a mighty jump from 22 to 24 Explaining As If It Was the 90s If you take a look at the numbers there are two time frames which in the 1990s would be questioned. First would be the incredible leap he took from his first year in the big leagues to his first MVP season in 1956. His batting average jumped 50 points. His slugging percentage jumped 90 points and he hit 15 more homers than his previous high. This wouldn't merrit a conviction nowadays though because the young age he...