Skip to main content

Rafa Is Officially the Tennis King

While you were sleeping on Sunday Morning dreaming of the beer and food you were going to consume durign the Super Bowl, something happenned. A Man, a Legend was Officially Dethroned. In knocking off Roger Federer in the fifth set of the Australian Open finals Rafael Nadal grasped the tennis crown in his hands and firmly placed it on his head.

Now Rafa is not just The King of Clay, he is one of only 4 men's tennis players to own Grand Slams on three different surfaces. He, like Roger, is missing just one Major trophy on his mantlepiece. Unlike Roger, though, he just proved he could get it done on a hardcourt. Meanwhile, Roger needs to get by Rafa on the Clay which looked light years away after the 6-1 6-3 6-0 beatdown in Paris last year. The biggest difference between the two? Rafa owns Roger.

Rafa has defeated Roger in 5 of their 7 grand slam finals matches in addition to his dominance at lower courts. He comes up big at the biggest moments. On Sunday, it was actually Roger who had more total points (174-173), but not the big ones of course. Rafa converted 7 of his 16 break points in comparison to Roger who converted just 6 of his 19 chances. Roger fell apart in the 3rd set tie breaker, even double faulting to end the set. It all came down to the 5th and final set between the best 2 players on the planet. The momentum laid squarely at the feet of Roger, but in the end Rafael Nadal, the best player on the planet, the most clutch player on the planet, rallied up his 8th wind and knocked Roger's attempt to tie Pete Sampras's Major Record into the dumpster.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Bret Boone

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. Mr. Boone was once the best power hitting second baseman in the league. How questionable was his success? Averages Say: Why the extra plateu in his mid 30s? At Bats Per Home Run Says: Lowest at Bats Per Home Runs at 37? Hmm.... Explaining It Away Yeak, this one is tough. Umm, late bloomer? He showed potential power early in his career and he just liked playing in Seattle a lot more than everywhere else? And umm, his career was kind of like a running backs in that it just all of a sudden fell off the map? Any of these convincing you? The Verdict Guy never hits more than 24 home runs in a season and then in his age 32 season he hits 37? And in SafeCo a pitchers park to boot? And he follows that up with 24, 35, 24 homer years still at SafeCo? And then he completely falls off the map in 2005 never to be heard from again? We've got a Screamer... Man Get Big Muscles In 30s. Hm...

2014 Pittsburgh Steelers helmet schedule