Skip to main content

Recapping My 2008 NFL Season Predictions


Here is a breakdown by team of my predictions from worst to best. Predicted Record is in the parenthesis, actual record is in the brackets. Le'Ron is very very confused as to how I predicted them to win one game.

The Really Bad

Baltimore (1-15) [11-5] +10: Come on you thought Joe Flacco was going to lead them to the division title? My ass.

Detroit (8-8) [0-16] -8: So... I picked them to win the division. I've already beaten myself for this as well.

Atlanta (3-13) [11-5] -8: Come on you thought the friggin Falcons would be good?

St. Louis (8-8) [2-14] -6: Ya I kind of banked on them being mediocre in my fantasy league. They sucked and so did my fantasy team.

Carolina (6-10) [12-4] +6: Jake was coming off Tommy John surgery, did you really expect him to play really well?

New Orleans (14-2) [8-8] -6: They suffered too many injuries, but 14-2 was really never realistic.

Seattle (9-7) [4-12] -5: Too many injuries to come close to this mark.

Jacksonville (10-6) [5-11] -5: Don't really have any idea how this team fell off a cliff.

San Francisco (2-14) [7-9] +5: Maybe if Mike Nolan stayed on as coach they would have been closer to 2-14.

Miami (6-10) [11-5] +6: At 6-10, I was higher on the Dolphins than almost everyone. Nobody had them in the playoffs.

The Bad

Cincinnati (8-8) [4-11-1] -4: Carson Palmer going down equals a not .500 football team.

New England (15-1) [11-5] -4: Tom Brady going down equals a team not going to the Super Bowl.

Minnesota (6-10) [10-6] +4: The won 10 games cause their division sucks even more than I thought it would.

Kansas City (5-11) [2-14] -3: From awful prediction to very awful season.

San Diego (11-5) [8-8] -3: The Chargers severely underperformed this year.

Dallas (12-4) [9-7] -3: Tony Home getting hurt certainly didn't help the cowgirls.

Oakland (2-14) [5-11] +3: Are you kind of shocked to see that the Raiders won 5 games? I am, it certainly didn't seem like that.

Houston (5-11) [8-8] +3: If Schaub was healthy they would have done even better.

Chicago (6-10) [9-7] +3: Again I underestimated just how much their schedule sucked.

Tennessee (10-6) [13-3] +3: I had them in the playoffs, but certainly didn't have them as a #1 seed.

The Oh So Close

Cleveland (6-10) [4-12] -2: Everyone was way way way too high on the Browns going into this season. I was not.

Buffalo (9-7) [7-9] -2: The Bills were mediocre. Not surprising.

Denver (10-6) [8-8] -2: They probably should have gone 10-6 but did way too much choking down the stretch.

Pittsburgh (14-2) [12-4] -2: With Fast Willie out they didn't have much of a chance to get to 14-2.

Washington (6-10) [8-8] +2: They were mediocre instead of slightly worse than mediocre.

Tampa Bay (7-9) [9-7] +2: If only my Devil Rays prediction was this close.

New York Jets (10-6) [9-7] -1: They should have exceeded my expectations but instead the asphyxiation in December made them fall short.

Philadelphia (8-8) [9-7-1] +1: The Iggles looked like an 8-8 team or worse after the Ravens game, but they fought back and here they are on the Superbowl door step.

The On The Money

Green Bay (6-10) [6-10] +0: Hoorah for thinking the Packers would have lots of problems with Rodgers at the helm.

Arizona (9-7) [9-7] 0: Hoorah I had them winning the division.

New York Giants (12-4) [12-4] 0: I was high on the G-Men, unlike most who thought they would falter some, and they proved worthy of that praise. Well until the playoffs of course.

Indianapolis (12-4) [12-4] 0: Back to back years I got the Colts record right. Yippy.

Year 1 vs. Year 2 vs. Year 3

Here's the moral of the story, when I pick games I do it on a one by one basis. I look at Week 1 and pick all the games. I look at Week 2 and pick all the games. I look at Week 3, etc. Then when I finish week 17 I add up the records. I make no changes to my picks, I fiddle with nothing and I try to not think about the aggregate records when making the decisions in say Week 14. So what happens is that a lot of teams skew to high ends of the spectrum. For instance having so many teams at 12-4 or above is unrealistic. In the end my picks aren't safe and I give myself the opportunity to be really really wrong by picking teams to win 1 game. Anyway, this year the only thing I did better than the last two years was get the on the money right, other than that it was a poor showing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Bret Boone

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. Mr. Boone was once the best power hitting second baseman in the league. How questionable was his success? Averages Say: Why the extra plateu in his mid 30s? At Bats Per Home Run Says: Lowest at Bats Per Home Runs at 37? Hmm.... Explaining It Away Yeak, this one is tough. Umm, late bloomer? He showed potential power early in his career and he just liked playing in Seattle a lot more than everywhere else? And umm, his career was kind of like a running backs in that it just all of a sudden fell off the map? Any of these convincing you? The Verdict Guy never hits more than 24 home runs in a season and then in his age 32 season he hits 37? And in SafeCo a pitchers park to boot? And he follows that up with 24, 35, 24 homer years still at SafeCo? And then he completely falls off the map in 2005 never to be heard from again? We've got a Screamer... Man Get Big Muscles In 30s. Hm...

2014 Pittsburgh Steelers helmet schedule