Skip to main content

Ryan Raburn Should Have Played the Ball Into a Single

The title of this post is false, yet it is the premise that everybody is saying: "Ryan Raburn should have not gambled and should have just played the ball into a single, kept the double play in order and forced the Twins to do more to score the tying run." To this I again say false. It wasn't the thought process of going for the ball that was Raburn's issue, it was his execution which was horrendous. This ball could have and perhaps should have been caught.

First and foremost, Raburn got a slow jump on the ball at best. He was a bit tentative and was unsure if he was going to get to the ball, so he was indecisive. But eventually he realized he was going to get to the ball and did this:


As you can see in the above screen capture, Raburn does the old feet first slide catch. This gives you a bit more body control than the face first version and is a better play for keeping the ball in front of you. The issue again isn't with the decision, it's with the execution. When Raburn goes after the ball, he does not properly align his body with the flight of the ball, this in turn places it a few feet to his left, high enough to be caught but completely out of his reach. It is especially out of his reach thanks to the fact that he gator armed the play as well.

So to recap everything, this ball was most certainly catchable, Raburn's issue wasn't with deciding to go after it, it was with his execution. Raburn got a poor jump, but still a good enough jump to get to the ball while it was still in the air. The poor jump lead to him taking a poor angle on the ball. The poor angle resulted in a slide/attempt that had little to no chance either making a successful catch or at minimum keeping the ball in front. As a result, Raburn looked like he made a foolish decision when in actuality he turned what would have been a fine decision into a poor one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Lou Holtz is the Homer / Annoyingly Delusional

As my buddy Joe and I always joke, if Notre Dame was suiting up against an all Jesus team, aka a team made up of 55 Sons of God, Lou Holtz would probably still pick Notre Dame to win by a touchdown. So of course this weekend when I'm watching Sportscenter and they have him and fellow old man Corso making predictions, Lou picks ND to beat Michigan. Not that big of a deal, Michigan is a big question mark this year, but of course than Lou says that Notre Dame will win 11 games this year. This is the same Notre Dame that lost to a service academy last year. And just when you thought the douchy homerism was going to end ESPN asks which BCS school is going to be the biggest surprise team in the country. Any guesses to whom it was? I'll give you a clue it was another team he coached. If you guessed South Carolina you would be a winner. Next up on Lou's prediction watch, the Jets win the Superbowl, NC St. wins the ACC, Arkansas dominates the SEC West, Minnesota wins the Big...

Guest Post: Thoughts on Sabathia Signing

I asked Grutt what his thoughts were on the Sabathia signing and I thought his response pretty much nailed it. So here it is. I don’t know. Every year I get a little more disenchanted with baseball. Yea, it’s great we signed the top pitching free agent. But we were supposed to. No team was even in the ballpark of the Yankees offer yet they still needed to jump from the already ridiculous price of $140 million to $160 million to close the deal. Now I hear we are going to sign more pitchers who will also get large contracts and the position player gaps are still glaring. Each new, large contract just adds to the feeling that the Yanks are supposed to win it all. “I think we have a good chance this year.” That is a lost feeling. If they don’t win I’ll wonder why, like there has to be some other reason besides that it’s a sport you can never predict how things will work out and some years just aren’t yours to be won. If they win I will be pleasantly smug. It gets a little more...