Skip to main content

Out of Conference Scheds: Big 12

Instead of going through analysis of given teams, for which I would probably just be guessing, I rather am going to assess each conferences schedules. In particular each conference Out of Conference schedules to see if they like the cupcakes or an actual challenge.

Summary

The Big 12 which I typically find the least interesting conference in America has surprisingly put together a solid rotation of games. With the exception of Texas Tech, whom seems like the Big 12s version of Wisconsin in accordance to aversion of difficult games, the Big 12 plays a bunch of tough games. The Big 12s biggest positive is that for the most part they avoided any bottom of the BCS bottom of the barrel teams. They have games against top conference schools like Va Tech and WVU and then they play a bunch of middle of the pack to contender BCS schools like Illinois, Arkansas, Miami, FSU, etc. The worst BCS opponents they play are arguably the Washington schools but even they are no Duke or Northwestern or Stanford teams you know are going to finish at the bottom of their conference.

1 Team Out of Conference Sum Up: Texas

I feel Texas sums up the Big 12 out of conference schedule the best as they fall right in the middle of the difficulty level. The Longhorns like most of the conference squads favor staying home. Only Iowa St. has more than 1 road game, meanwhile 3 teams Texas included never leave their home state. Additionally Texas has one difficult out of conference game, the typical Big 12 amount with a surrounding package of a decent squad (UTEP) and a few very easy home games.

Final Say

While I'm overall impressed with the Big 12s scheduling I really wish that those games against WVU and Va Tech involved Oklahoma and Texas rather than Colorado and Nebraska. All in all Texas Tech is really the only Big 12 school to be completely ashamed with their scheduling where as you have to give the Buffs the most credit for putting together to big time matchups against FSU and WVU at the tale end of their out of conference games.

Comments

The Lit Review said…
I agree that the schedules are more interesting this year and I think you might have missed a few things by focusing on BCS opponents. Oklahoma State and Troy will be an interesting match-up (remember who won that one last year).

Tech plays at Nevada, which could be a lot of fun and also plays UMass, a top notch FCS program--which will be interesting along with the App State game in Baton Rouge after the Ann Arbor disaster last year.

Oklahoma vs. TCU will also be a rematch in which the BCS team will try to get redemption, and the last A&M v. Army game (which is inherently interesting with the military traditions) was an instant classic. A&M also travels to New Mexico, which is a very dangerous idea if you want to win your non-conference games. These are also games worth watching in my opinion.

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Mickey Mantle

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. This week it's throwing a curve ball and looking at All Time Great Yankees. Players that we know did not take steroids to see if this gives a defense to any of the players 'convicted' by Numbers on Steroids. Time to look at my dad's favorite athlete of all time, Mickey Mantle. Averages Say: What's with the mysterious dip at 27 and then the uptick? At Bats Per Home Run Says: That's a mighty jump from 22 to 24 Explaining As If It Was the 90s If you take a look at the numbers there are two time frames which in the 1990s would be questioned. First would be the incredible leap he took from his first year in the big leagues to his first MVP season in 1956. His batting average jumped 50 points. His slugging percentage jumped 90 points and he hit 15 more homers than his previous high. This wouldn't merrit a conviction nowadays though because the young age he...

Guest Post: Thoughts on Sabathia Signing

I asked Grutt what his thoughts were on the Sabathia signing and I thought his response pretty much nailed it. So here it is. I don’t know. Every year I get a little more disenchanted with baseball. Yea, it’s great we signed the top pitching free agent. But we were supposed to. No team was even in the ballpark of the Yankees offer yet they still needed to jump from the already ridiculous price of $140 million to $160 million to close the deal. Now I hear we are going to sign more pitchers who will also get large contracts and the position player gaps are still glaring. Each new, large contract just adds to the feeling that the Yanks are supposed to win it all. “I think we have a good chance this year.” That is a lost feeling. If they don’t win I’ll wonder why, like there has to be some other reason besides that it’s a sport you can never predict how things will work out and some years just aren’t yours to be won. If they win I will be pleasantly smug. It gets a little more...