Skip to main content

Numbers On Steroids: Sammy Sosa

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you.

"Baseball's been berry berry good to me" Sammy Sosa. But were steroids what were really berry berry good to Sammy? Let's take a look at this numbers to see how much the rates mightily changed in his career.

Averages Say: Slugging Percentage is like a mountain that keeps on climbing and climbing until testing started. Hmm....

Stats Per At Bat Says: Again the climb is on, and then the mysterious dip.

At Bats Per Home Run Says: Apparently Sammy just magically found a home run swing in 93 and lost in 2005.

Explaining It Away

In his first few years Sammy Sosa was incredibly young. He broke into the league at age 20 and didn't do much in 89 for either the Rangers or the White Sox. In 90 he had his first full season in which he hit 15 home runs as a 21 year old. The next two seasons didn't see much improvement possibly because he was injured and didn't get a full season under his belt. The 1993 breakout 33 home run year came in his next full season. The more difficult years to explain away start at 1998. In 1997 Sosa was a solid player while hitting 36 home runs and racking up 118 rbi. The next season though, the Home Run total almost doubled finishing at 66. Over the next three years Sosa his 63, 50, and 64 home runs respectively.

Sosa's steady decline could possibly be explained as just losing a step in his old age. In 2005 he was a latine 36 year old (potentially 87 years old in real human years) playing for the Orioles and no longer in the comfy Wrigley field setting. He was terrible. In 2007 he came back with the Rangers and was respectable just not terrific, but again he was 38 that season.

The Verdict

Believing that a player who had already played 9 seasons in the big leagues could double his home run totals from a solid 36 to an unimaginable 66 is too much of a stretch. Throw in the corked bat incident and...

If it Walks Like a Duck and Quacks Like a Duck... Than It's Probably a Duck

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm not a Sammy Sosa supporter. I was one of the Wrigley faithful clamoring for him to be traded in 2001. That said, in mid April 2003, Sosa was beaned in the head by Salomon Torres, and after his return, was sidelined with a toe injury that plagued him until mid-May when he went on the DL. The corked bat happened at the end of May 2003. Anyone who watched Sosa return after the beaning can attest that he had some happy feet and was very tentative, almost afraid, in the batters box. I think it's very fair to argue that he was never ever the same slugger after that headshot.
Sosa was also an egomaniac and the bad publicity from the corked bat, the video of Sosa leaving early at the end of 2004, and the constant insinuation that he was a steroid user (mixed with his fanbase turning on him) left the arrogant Sosa a mess.
Sosa was not included in the Mitchell report. There are no reports of players or dealers associating with him regarding drugs or PEDs. It's assumed he used, but there's not a ounce of proof anywhere.
Your stats suggest an abnormality. Sosa's increase is certainly suspicious. However, given the amount of proof (meaning none), it's equally arguable that the headbeaning in April 2003, the corked bat episode, and the subsequent fallout with his fanbase are just as much to blame with his demise as the easy suggestion that he was just getting off the juice.
Maybe he used. Maybe he didn't. The beautiful thing about statistical data is that the interpretation of it can be so easily manipulated to prove any argument true or false. But getting back into a batters box facing 95 mph pitching after getting hit in the head can be devastating for a player, and your stats prove that truth as much as your suggestion that he was simply a steroid user.

Popular posts from this blog

Lou Holtz is the Homer / Annoyingly Delusional

As my buddy Joe and I always joke, if Notre Dame was suiting up against an all Jesus team, aka a team made up of 55 Sons of God, Lou Holtz would probably still pick Notre Dame to win by a touchdown. So of course this weekend when I'm watching Sportscenter and they have him and fellow old man Corso making predictions, Lou picks ND to beat Michigan. Not that big of a deal, Michigan is a big question mark this year, but of course than Lou says that Notre Dame will win 11 games this year. This is the same Notre Dame that lost to a service academy last year. And just when you thought the douchy homerism was going to end ESPN asks which BCS school is going to be the biggest surprise team in the country. Any guesses to whom it was? I'll give you a clue it was another team he coached. If you guessed South Carolina you would be a winner. Next up on Lou's prediction watch, the Jets win the Superbowl, NC St. wins the ACC, Arkansas dominates the SEC West, Minnesota wins the Big

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Ranking the New York Jets Historical Helmets

There's no way you can't go with the Helmet they won the Super Bowl in. You just can't. Next, I really don't understand why they don't where the helmet with the Jet as their throwback uniforms. That helmet is awesome. Then I'm going with the Helmets from the 80s because it's the classic feel and the white face mask is 10 times better than the black one. And the rankings continue until you get to... The Titans Helmet. I hate everything about those Titan uniforms. The Helmets are boring and the colors are GOD awful. Navy blue and Mustard? What the hell is that. Disgusting. If they wore those unis when I was a kid I'd probably be a Giant fan, and be much happier with my life in football.