Skip to main content

Debating Belichick's Decision

Bill Belichick made by far the biggest decision of the game last night. He decided to go for 4th down on his own 28 yard line. The Pats didn't get it and essentially they were screwed. After the game the entire world stated that this was the worst decision in Belichick's coaching career that it was a colossal blunder, etc. etc. etc. But when you look at it, it just might not have been that bad of a decision. Here were his three options.

A) Punt and hope the Colts can't drive 70+ yards in 2 minutes with a timeout.
B) Miss the First Down and hope your defense can man up from 30 yards
C) Get the First Down and Win

Before we stick approximate percentages on those options lets do a bit of analysis on the Colts offense. The Colts had 4 prior touchdown drives. Each drive went at least 79 yards and each lasted under 3:28 seconds. The 4 drives went an average of 82 yards in 2 minutes and 35 seconds. But its actually worse than that. Two of the previous three Colts possessions were 79 yard touchdown drives, one lasting 2:04 and the other just 1:49. Neither drive required the utilization of a timeout. Punting the ball away is asking your defense to not do something it could not do 2 of the last 3 times. The lone stop of the past three possessions the Patriots made was a first play interception.

Meanwhile going for the first down you are putting the ball in the hands of a former MVP and by far the stronger side of your team. You are asking him to pick up just 2 yards to finish the game. The Patriots offense had dominated the entire game. Sometimes you can't just say here's what the typical football decision is go with it.

I think if you conservatively say that there was a 50% chance the Pats pick up the first down and conservatively say that Peyton Manning had just a 50% chance of driving the Colts 70 yards in 2 minutes than the numbers still actually stack in Belichick's favor.

Punt: 50%
Get the First Down: 100%
Miss It: Some percentage > 0%
Overall Go For It Percentage: 50+%

Essentially what I'm saying in the above percentage is that if you get it you win. If you don't, you have some percent chance of actually stopping the Colts, that certain percent puts the overall moves chance to win at above 50/50. It's either 50% chance to win or give your defense 44 more yards to work with which may not even help much given how shitty the defense is playing. The more and more I think about it, I think he made the right decision. It just didn't work out. Blame Kevin Faulk for not catching the ball cleanly.

~Defending Bill Belichick makes me want to vomit

Comments

Simon said…
Also watching Tony Dungy criticize Bill Belichick annoys me. Hey Tony 3>1.

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Mickey Mantle

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. This week it's throwing a curve ball and looking at All Time Great Yankees. Players that we know did not take steroids to see if this gives a defense to any of the players 'convicted' by Numbers on Steroids. Time to look at my dad's favorite athlete of all time, Mickey Mantle. Averages Say: What's with the mysterious dip at 27 and then the uptick? At Bats Per Home Run Says: That's a mighty jump from 22 to 24 Explaining As If It Was the 90s If you take a look at the numbers there are two time frames which in the 1990s would be questioned. First would be the incredible leap he took from his first year in the big leagues to his first MVP season in 1956. His batting average jumped 50 points. His slugging percentage jumped 90 points and he hit 15 more homers than his previous high. This wouldn't merrit a conviction nowadays though because the young age he...

Guest Post: Thoughts on Sabathia Signing

I asked Grutt what his thoughts were on the Sabathia signing and I thought his response pretty much nailed it. So here it is. I don’t know. Every year I get a little more disenchanted with baseball. Yea, it’s great we signed the top pitching free agent. But we were supposed to. No team was even in the ballpark of the Yankees offer yet they still needed to jump from the already ridiculous price of $140 million to $160 million to close the deal. Now I hear we are going to sign more pitchers who will also get large contracts and the position player gaps are still glaring. Each new, large contract just adds to the feeling that the Yanks are supposed to win it all. “I think we have a good chance this year.” That is a lost feeling. If they don’t win I’ll wonder why, like there has to be some other reason besides that it’s a sport you can never predict how things will work out and some years just aren’t yours to be won. If they win I will be pleasantly smug. It gets a little more...