Skip to main content

Bring Charlie Back

When I logged on to Gmail this morning I noticed that one of my buddies status message read "bring back charlie". So I decided to question him and a few other of my Patriot fan friends to see if and why they want Charlie Weis back on the staff.

Tmags: I hate the play calling this year and weis was more into power football and the pats are morphing into a soft team. Weis would spread it out but he wasnt averse to lining up and playing smashmouth football when needed.

Big Steve: I would def take him back, we need an OC and a real DC, I say bring romeo back too. Lets be serious, our playcalling is one of our biggest problems.

Pete: The offense is fine (though Brady played like complete garbage last night). The bigger issue is that we haven’t had a playmaking defense since Harrison came back down to Earth which was about in 2005. If Belichick is this defensive genius, then why was our pathetic 2001 defense that went 5-11 the year prior better then all defenses since we last won a title?

Listen I love Belichick and I want no other coach, even when he goes for it on 4th down there always seems to be a lucid logic behind it as if I he had plan for this scenario…even though they don’t always work out. But these days it seems he is a better GM than he is a game planner which is the opposite of what I initially thought.

So in a nutshell I would be happy to have Weis back to help add input to the team and perhaps bring back some of that air of success from earlier in the decade, but I don’t think he is the piece that is missing, that piece is on defense and on defensive playmaking. I mean is there a more painful defense to watch than the Pats? And the absurd thing is, they are like always in the top 5 in points allowed…


So it appears 3 for 3 are in favor of Pats nostalgia. See Charlie, some people still love you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Mickey Mantle

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. This week it's throwing a curve ball and looking at All Time Great Yankees. Players that we know did not take steroids to see if this gives a defense to any of the players 'convicted' by Numbers on Steroids. Time to look at my dad's favorite athlete of all time, Mickey Mantle. Averages Say: What's with the mysterious dip at 27 and then the uptick? At Bats Per Home Run Says: That's a mighty jump from 22 to 24 Explaining As If It Was the 90s If you take a look at the numbers there are two time frames which in the 1990s would be questioned. First would be the incredible leap he took from his first year in the big leagues to his first MVP season in 1956. His batting average jumped 50 points. His slugging percentage jumped 90 points and he hit 15 more homers than his previous high. This wouldn't merrit a conviction nowadays though because the young age he...

Guest Post: Thoughts on Sabathia Signing

I asked Grutt what his thoughts were on the Sabathia signing and I thought his response pretty much nailed it. So here it is. I don’t know. Every year I get a little more disenchanted with baseball. Yea, it’s great we signed the top pitching free agent. But we were supposed to. No team was even in the ballpark of the Yankees offer yet they still needed to jump from the already ridiculous price of $140 million to $160 million to close the deal. Now I hear we are going to sign more pitchers who will also get large contracts and the position player gaps are still glaring. Each new, large contract just adds to the feeling that the Yanks are supposed to win it all. “I think we have a good chance this year.” That is a lost feeling. If they don’t win I’ll wonder why, like there has to be some other reason besides that it’s a sport you can never predict how things will work out and some years just aren’t yours to be won. If they win I will be pleasantly smug. It gets a little more...