Skip to main content

Ryan Raburn Should Have Played the Ball Into a Single

The title of this post is false, yet it is the premise that everybody is saying: "Ryan Raburn should have not gambled and should have just played the ball into a single, kept the double play in order and forced the Twins to do more to score the tying run." To this I again say false. It wasn't the thought process of going for the ball that was Raburn's issue, it was his execution which was horrendous. This ball could have and perhaps should have been caught.

First and foremost, Raburn got a slow jump on the ball at best. He was a bit tentative and was unsure if he was going to get to the ball, so he was indecisive. But eventually he realized he was going to get to the ball and did this:


As you can see in the above screen capture, Raburn does the old feet first slide catch. This gives you a bit more body control than the face first version and is a better play for keeping the ball in front of you. The issue again isn't with the decision, it's with the execution. When Raburn goes after the ball, he does not properly align his body with the flight of the ball, this in turn places it a few feet to his left, high enough to be caught but completely out of his reach. It is especially out of his reach thanks to the fact that he gator armed the play as well.

So to recap everything, this ball was most certainly catchable, Raburn's issue wasn't with deciding to go after it, it was with his execution. Raburn got a poor jump, but still a good enough jump to get to the ball while it was still in the air. The poor jump lead to him taking a poor angle on the ball. The poor angle resulted in a slide/attempt that had little to no chance either making a successful catch or at minimum keeping the ball in front. As a result, Raburn looked like he made a foolish decision when in actuality he turned what would have been a fine decision into a poor one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Bret Boone

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. Mr. Boone was once the best power hitting second baseman in the league. How questionable was his success? Averages Say: Why the extra plateu in his mid 30s? At Bats Per Home Run Says: Lowest at Bats Per Home Runs at 37? Hmm.... Explaining It Away Yeak, this one is tough. Umm, late bloomer? He showed potential power early in his career and he just liked playing in Seattle a lot more than everywhere else? And umm, his career was kind of like a running backs in that it just all of a sudden fell off the map? Any of these convincing you? The Verdict Guy never hits more than 24 home runs in a season and then in his age 32 season he hits 37? And in SafeCo a pitchers park to boot? And he follows that up with 24, 35, 24 homer years still at SafeCo? And then he completely falls off the map in 2005 never to be heard from again? We've got a Screamer... Man Get Big Muscles In 30s. Hm...

Numbers On Steroids: Mickey Mantle

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. This week it's throwing a curve ball and looking at All Time Great Yankees. Players that we know did not take steroids to see if this gives a defense to any of the players 'convicted' by Numbers on Steroids. Time to look at my dad's favorite athlete of all time, Mickey Mantle. Averages Say: What's with the mysterious dip at 27 and then the uptick? At Bats Per Home Run Says: That's a mighty jump from 22 to 24 Explaining As If It Was the 90s If you take a look at the numbers there are two time frames which in the 1990s would be questioned. First would be the incredible leap he took from his first year in the big leagues to his first MVP season in 1956. His batting average jumped 50 points. His slugging percentage jumped 90 points and he hit 15 more homers than his previous high. This wouldn't merrit a conviction nowadays though because the young age he...