Skip to main content

Kershaw or Maddux for Game 4

You're Joe Torre, you have one significant pitching decision to make outside of gametime decisions and that is who are you throwing game 4. Your options are poler opposites.

On one hand you have Greg Maddux, who made his debut in 1986 and was one of the best pitchers of his generation. He has all of the postseason experience you could ask for having started 30 games in his career including 5 games in the World Series to the tune of a 3.32 ERA. Granted he doesn't have the stuff he used to have and he struggled down the stretch for the Dodgers (5.09 ERA in Dodger Blue) but he's a wily veteran who knows how to get it done.

On the other hand you have young uber prospect Clayton Kershaw. A rookie born 2 years after Maddux's major league debut, he's a giant fireballin lefty with superb stuff. Kershaw also finished off the season with his best month posting a 3.45 and 29 Ks in 28 2/3 innings. He'll definitely bring youthful exuberance to the hill if he starts but could the pressure adversely effect him?

Outside of the experience factor and the stuff factor there are matchup questions. Neither pitcher had much success with the opposition as Kershaw posted an 8+ ERA in 2 starts and Maddux a 5+ ERA in 3 starts. The Phillies are a left handed dominant team with their biggest two bats being Utley and Howard so that would lead you to believe that throwing the lefty Kershaw would be the smart move. But then again, if you could utilize Kershaw as the left handed specialist to go after Utley and Howard in clutch spots in every game wouldn't you?

It's a tough decision for Joe, but I think I'd go with the Maddux experience and the ability to use Kershaw to match up with Utley and Howard on a nightly basis.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Mickey Mantle

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. This week it's throwing a curve ball and looking at All Time Great Yankees. Players that we know did not take steroids to see if this gives a defense to any of the players 'convicted' by Numbers on Steroids. Time to look at my dad's favorite athlete of all time, Mickey Mantle. Averages Say: What's with the mysterious dip at 27 and then the uptick? At Bats Per Home Run Says: That's a mighty jump from 22 to 24 Explaining As If It Was the 90s If you take a look at the numbers there are two time frames which in the 1990s would be questioned. First would be the incredible leap he took from his first year in the big leagues to his first MVP season in 1956. His batting average jumped 50 points. His slugging percentage jumped 90 points and he hit 15 more homers than his previous high. This wouldn't merrit a conviction nowadays though because the young age he...

Guest Post: Thoughts on Sabathia Signing

I asked Grutt what his thoughts were on the Sabathia signing and I thought his response pretty much nailed it. So here it is. I don’t know. Every year I get a little more disenchanted with baseball. Yea, it’s great we signed the top pitching free agent. But we were supposed to. No team was even in the ballpark of the Yankees offer yet they still needed to jump from the already ridiculous price of $140 million to $160 million to close the deal. Now I hear we are going to sign more pitchers who will also get large contracts and the position player gaps are still glaring. Each new, large contract just adds to the feeling that the Yanks are supposed to win it all. “I think we have a good chance this year.” That is a lost feeling. If they don’t win I’ll wonder why, like there has to be some other reason besides that it’s a sport you can never predict how things will work out and some years just aren’t yours to be won. If they win I will be pleasantly smug. It gets a little more...