Skip to main content

Squeezing Yourself Out of the Postseason

Last night Mike Scioscia decided that it was his time to pull the genius move that it was his time to make the difference and that 1 run would get it done. So he called the suicide squeeze with his speediest runner at third and his biggest sacrificing lamb at the plate, and it completely backfired. Willits was tagged out and the momentum swung from the Angels dugout directly into Jason Bay's at bat and the rest is history.

If you look just at the players involved in the situation it looks like the right call. If Aybar, not a very good hitter and arguably your best bunter, gets the ball down you then get to turn a 1 run lead over to a record breaking closer. The strategy at the top level looks solid. But dig a bit deeper and there are some holes to find. Obviously on a suicide squeeze its essential to get a ball that can be bunted. Aybar had a 2-0 count against Delcarmen, so it would appear as if Delcarmen needed to bring a strike. The problem was that Delcarmen almost drilled Aybar on two previous pitches and with 1 out in a tie ball game throwing a strike on the next pitch was not due or die. In addition the faster the pitch the more difficult it is to bunt and Delcarmen is certainly a hard thrower. So combine these aspects and what you end up with is expected, a 95+ heater off the plate inside, a difficult pitch to handle for any bunter.

If it had worked everyone would have applauded the genius of Scioscia, but he picked a bad spot for the squeeze and because he did, his team now has a tee time for Wednesday afternoon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M E T S = Mercifully End The Season

Do it before David Wright gets Hurt!

Numbers On Steroids: Bret Boone

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. Mr. Boone was once the best power hitting second baseman in the league. How questionable was his success? Averages Say: Why the extra plateu in his mid 30s? At Bats Per Home Run Says: Lowest at Bats Per Home Runs at 37? Hmm.... Explaining It Away Yeak, this one is tough. Umm, late bloomer? He showed potential power early in his career and he just liked playing in Seattle a lot more than everywhere else? And umm, his career was kind of like a running backs in that it just all of a sudden fell off the map? Any of these convincing you? The Verdict Guy never hits more than 24 home runs in a season and then in his age 32 season he hits 37? And in SafeCo a pitchers park to boot? And he follows that up with 24, 35, 24 homer years still at SafeCo? And then he completely falls off the map in 2005 never to be heard from again? We've got a Screamer... Man Get Big Muscles In 30s. Hm...

Numbers On Steroids: Mickey Mantle

Numbers on Steroids is a look at baseball players during the 90s to see if anything screams out at you. This week it's throwing a curve ball and looking at All Time Great Yankees. Players that we know did not take steroids to see if this gives a defense to any of the players 'convicted' by Numbers on Steroids. Time to look at my dad's favorite athlete of all time, Mickey Mantle. Averages Say: What's with the mysterious dip at 27 and then the uptick? At Bats Per Home Run Says: That's a mighty jump from 22 to 24 Explaining As If It Was the 90s If you take a look at the numbers there are two time frames which in the 1990s would be questioned. First would be the incredible leap he took from his first year in the big leagues to his first MVP season in 1956. His batting average jumped 50 points. His slugging percentage jumped 90 points and he hit 15 more homers than his previous high. This wouldn't merrit a conviction nowadays though because the young age he...